|
continued
Jon
Krupnick prefers to hire new associates and train them, rather than
bring in experienced litigators: "It's my firm belief that if you
grow up as a family, you tend to stay together."
"There are egos, but they don't have any infighting," says
Michael Robinson, a Fort Lauderdale solo practitioner who left the
firm in 1990. "Working there was pretty intense and very demanding,
but there was a lot of camaraderie. We'd go out and play basketball,
football and golf together. They are just normal folk who developed
into very fine trial lawyers."
Formula for success
While the result of the Benlate® cases captured headlines, Krupnick
Campbell has a long history of multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements
in its representation of personal injury, medical malpractice and
products liability plaintiffs clients. Firm revenues for the past
several years averaged $10 million to $12 million. Even without Benlate®,
1994 would have been a banner year for the firm with revenues of $13
million.
Without that financial strength, the firm never could have afforded
to take the Benlate® cases. And it's an important reason other
firms refer cases to Krupnick Campbell: the firm can finance litigation
costs and so can't be pressured into accepting low settlement offers.
"We are not going to settle for less than full value," Campbell
says. "We have the means to proceed and do the best for our clients."
Another factor in the firm's success, Krupnick says, is his practice
of hiring new associates and training them, rather than bringing in
experienced litigators. There is one exception. In 1989, Krupnick
hired highly regarded Kelly Hancock, chief of the Broward State Attorney's
Office's homicide division.
"Kelly is the only established lawyer we ever hired," Krupnick says.
"When you take green, raw young talent and evolve together, there
isn't stress like you have when you bring in three or more established
lawyers together. It's my firm belief that if you grow up as a family
you tend to stay together."
The result is a firm that is highly respected by competitors and opposing
counsel. A case in point is DuPont attorney Frank Shepherd.
"The Benlate® cases are probably a pretty good example for
the need for tort reform," he grouses. But he begrudgingly adds
about Krupnick Campell: "They represent their clients pretty
ably."
Founding Partner
The
driving force behind the 20-year -old firm is founder Krupnick, a
tenacious litigator who has achieved more than 120 verdicts and settlements
in excess of $1 million each.
In 1983, Krupnick
received the largest personal injury verdict in Florida when a jury
ordered Ford Motor Co. and motorist Ruth Aaron to pay $16.5 million
after a car crash left his client a quadriplegic.
Krupnick's strengths lie in painstaking preparation for trial and
an ability to communicate clearly and convincingly to a jury, according
to current and former firm members and lawyers who have watched him
at work.
He typically brings a full-size model of a car or whatever he contends
is responsible for his client's injury into the courtroom so that
jurors can see it and understand what was defective. Once, when the
courtroom was too small to accommodate an inflated hot air balloon,
jurors were escorted to a field at Broward Community College
to see it. And he keeps miniature versions of the models for his office
as mementos of his cases.
"I've consulted with a lot of other law firms and seen other people
in action, and they just don't compare to Jon Krupnick," says Virgil
Rizzo, who was of counsel at Krupnick Campbell for eight years before
he retired. "He makes it crystal clear for the jury. He always had
a model made of the case. It's like a little toy, but he was dead
serious with it. You just got caught up in it and get excited also."
Continue
|